Building would be missed From: Sara Owen, Hastings
The “old” high school has very many memories for me and my family. I went to school there (1987-1991) and my grandfather graduated from there. I think it would be a great loss to tear it down. So old historic buildings with character are torn down and replaced with gas stations or strip malls. Please save the old school!
Building remains serviceable From: Judd and Barb Owen, Annandale
We would like to express our support of saving the 1922 school building. It remains a serviceable building and should be updated to become usable. Trends come and go in building styles, the 1922 building remains a classic.
We are unable to attend upcoming meetings concerning this issue but would like to express our support in saving this building.
Save the 1922 school building From: Barb Lundberg, Annandale
I have been following updates on the 1922 section of the Annandale Middle School and was aware that there is a community task force studying our school facility. So I am pleased to read statements written in the Advocate or sent to me via e-mail, by respected and reliable sources, de-bunking the myth that the building is to be condemned. Tearing down a three-story brick structure where Wold Architects has determined the building envelope to be solid does not make sense to me either. I feel it should continue to be a school. I also feel like others, that the middle school helps to create a sense of neighborhood. I work across the street from the school at the library and I invite you to come in around 3 p.m. and see for yourself the kids who have walked across the from the middle school school and are using the internet stations, working on school projects at the tables or being able to sit in comfy chairs to read a book or magazine, before their ride comes.
Take action to save building From: Jill Bishop, Annandale
The April 9 informational meeting regarding the upcoming recommendation to the school board by the Facilities Task Force to demolish the 1922 school building was well attended. In addition to Laura Hood Beckman, my co-leader in this cause, there were two other task force members, two former school board members, Supt. Niklaus and numerous supportive community members. Many expressed their various reasons for saving the building, and Mr. Niklaus provided a handout showing the costs associated with the various alternatives considered. Mr. Niklaus’s figures showed an additional cost of $1.2-$2 million to complete deferred maintenance on the 1922 building, compared with demolishing it and adding fifth-grade classrooms to Bendix. $1.2- $2 million is actually a small portion of whatever the final bond referendum will be. The task force members present agreed the reason for their proposal to demolish rather than do the deferred maintenance on the 1922 building had not been money, but location. As was indicated in Jeff Lundquist’s letter in the April 9 Advocate, the decision to demolish the building reflects the long-term plan to move the entire middle school to a different site in the future, away from the current location near downtown Annandale. Jeff served on both the 2005 and 2008 Facilities Task Force groups, and he is well versed on the subject. His words mean something. His letter said that in 15-20 years, because the site is “undesirable and too small … it is best to move away from this building and location and plan toward a new middle school.” With the fire marshal’s and inspector’s reports that the building is structurally sound, the myth has been put to rest regarding the inevitability of the building’s demolition; now we can move toward deciding what to do. It has become clear the decision to demolish the 1922 building is not about money but about continuing on the course set many years ago to move all students away from downtown. We learned that catching up with the deferred maintenance, the $1.2- $2 million figure, would increase taxes for an average homeowner about $14 to $23 per year. Can we convince the school board to add the restoration of the 1922 building to the upcoming bond referendum? As background, I began the April 9 meeting with an explanation of why I was there. Back in 2005 I spoke to Jeff Lundquist in the coffee shop one day. He said the task force had recommended demolition of the 1922 building because there hadn’t been any indication the community cared about saving it. That same year, school board member Mike Dougherty was quoted in the Advocate as saying he “doubted that there would be any backlash demanding the board save it.” At the time I was distraught and believed saving the building was probably hopeless. Along with many in the community, including some former school board members, I believed the myth that the ultimate demolition of the building was inevitable. When it then came to light the building was structurally sound, I resolved to try and rally the community to provide that “backlash” and make their desires about saving the building known. The meeting adjourned with spontaneous applause for a suggestion from Laura Hood Beckman that those interested in saving the 1922 building work diligently with the task force, school board and community to get the bond referendum passed. There are many serious needs, the worst being Bendix, of course, along with the lack of ball fields. But with the second- lowest tax rate in the area we can afford to ask our community for the teaching and learning environment our students and teachers deserve. We must have faith in our community and trust they will want quality educational facilities for our children. I am looking forward to the time when the enthusiasm and commitment I have felt from the community about saving the building results in our combined efforts to create the right package for voters and its passage in the upcoming bond referendum. So what now? If you are in favor of saving the 1922 school building from the wrecking ball, please do the following: 1. Most important, attend the Monday, April 28, school board meeting to make a strong statement from the community. 2. Sign one of the petitions around town. It is an easy thing to do and is one more indication to the school board that it is important to save the 1922 building. Petitions are at the library, In Hot Water, Snooty Fox and numerous other businesses around town. 3. Pass the word and share with me the names of people interested in saving the building. We will keep people informed and remind them to attend the April 28 meeting. 4. Contact school board members. See their contact information below to write or email or call them. 5. Write a letter to the Advocate. The email address of editor Chuck Sterling is news@annandaleadvocate.com, and the email address of publisher Steve Prinsen is advocate@lakedalelink.net. 6. Put April 28 on your calendar. The school board meets at 7 p.m. in the middle school choir room. Bring along as many people as you can. Remember: Once it’s gone, it’s gone!
School board members:
Mary Barkley Brown 12274 Greer Ave. NW Maple Lake, MN 55358 963-5810
Michael Dougherty 80 Lake Drive East Annandale, MN 55302 274-3393
Norman Planer 8804 State Highway 24 NW Annandale, MN 55302 274-8636
Bryan Bruns 520 Hickory St. S Annandale, MN 55302 274-3000
Jeannette Rieger-Borer 11754 Jarvis Ave. NW Annandale, MN 55302 274-5316
Douglas Kantor 18715 Eaglewood Road Clearwater, MN 55320 320-558-2706
Supt. Steve Niklaus 274-5602, ext. 2900 sniklaus@annandale.k12.mn.us
Member says its worth saving Laura Hood Beckman, Annandale
I am reminded every day why the Annandale area is such a wonderful place to live and raise a family. This community is rich in volunteerism, willing citizens that work hard to make this a great place to live, learn and grow. I was honored to be asked to serve on the school district’s 2007 Facilities Task Force. I know there were many people willing to sit on this group and so feel fortunate that I was asked. Myself and a dozen other area citizens, school district teachers and administrators including two school board members spent the last six months reviewing a lot of information. I learned many things about our school facilities, what constitutes good learning space, what are ideal school sizes to provide maximum successful learning and recommended standards from our State Department of Education. Our group had the opportunity to review information from Wold Architects regarding building needs, costs and a few potential design scenarios. Our job was to review the work of the last Facilities Task Force to determine if their findings were current for today. A number of things had changed including concerns with the 1922 building, which is the three-story structure that is currently being used as part of our middle school.
As someone that believes in recycling and great architectural design, I was thrilled to find out first and foremost that it is possible to renovate the building so that it can continue to be used for academic purposes. We had been told at the start of our meetings and prior that the building had so many fire and building code violations that it could not be repaired. However, when a building inspector and representative of the State Fire Marshal toured the facility last fall both indicated that many needed maintenance items could be addressed without having to upgrade to some of the current new construction requirements. Touring the building, we had the opportunity to see the spacious classrooms, fantastic natural lighting and architectural detailing that we could never afford to duplicate today in a new building. Although neglected, this building today is still within reason to renovate and continue to serve our community another 80 years. We also discussed the possibility of having a private party purchase the 1922 building. Unfortunately the legalities of having a private party utilize a building that is attached to a functioning school is not likely. Another issue that was raised was the land size of the middle school site. In today’s standards it is small, however, like many schools in small towns and urban areas the school continues to function well. All schools in our district are landlocked; and that happens eventually with any new site construction.
The group was varied in opinions and priorities with not only the 1922 building but also other school district needs. There are many ways to achieve the same goal, that being great learning facilities for our students and teachers. I commend all that spent time on this effort and gave of their time and viewpoints. At some point the group needed to close. Over the course of the six months we reviewed a variety of scenarios with many other variations not explored, however the group could not go on forever. At what ended up to be our last meeting we were provided a new proposal draft that included adopting a long-range plan to begin to abandon the current middle school site by demolishing the 1922 building. The majority of the group approved this recommendation that will be presented to the school board on April 28.
One of my concerns with this plan is that it commits taxpayers to purchasing land and building a new middle school in the future. The location would be farther out of the heart of town. Many people find the location of the middle school ideal as the children can walk to the public library or downtown to have something to eat after school or an activity. It is a convenient location for parents as well as they are able to run errands downtown while they wait for their children. Many of the churches are within a reasonable and safe walking distance for many kids that have church school on Wednesdays. The school’s present location is very favorable with current community design trends that promote safety, walkability, health and a sense of neighborhood.
The cost to build the 1922 building was $140,000. Over 84 years that is $1,666 per year. With the proper repair and maintenance we can enjoy another 84 years. I hope our other facilities can provide that type of return on our taxpayer investment. As a task force we were only a small group of people, recognizing there are many citizens with ideas, concerns and opinions. It will be up to the school board to decide how to best move forward. I sincerely hope the school board members decide to keep the middle school in its current location.
Building is central to community Nancy Spencer Hable, Annandale
The “1922 Building” (the brick three- story, older portion of Annandale Middle School), directly across from and east of the library, is a longstanding part of this town’s education and history. The need to preserve that structure as a vital part of Annandale’s history and identity is beyond refute. One need only look at other small towns which have not done so to see the difference.
One of its greatest advantages is the 1922 building’s central location in the community. Students can be independent enough to walk to their church, public library or to downtown to eat a meal after school and before their next event, all within a safe proximity. It is a three-quarter walk to the elementary school. It has good traffic flow, is well lit, has good sidewalks and fits within current community design concepts. Although its location on 11 acres of land limits great future expansion, our district is not projecting exponential growth that would require such additions. It is walkable to ball fields, the ice rink and does have green space in the rear.
Furthermore, remodeling/repair vs. demolition is sound and responsible stewardship. As with many structures of this type, the quality and architectural details simply cannot be replaced in today’s economy. The proposed cost of demolition does not include environmental effects from landfill or utilization of resources to produce the building materials for a new structure. To restore the existing building, left so long in disrepair, is recycling at its best.
While I did not attend school in Annandale, I would very much like my grandchildren to be educated in the 1922 Building, should circumstances permit. To preserve this historical treasure is affordable, good for Annandale and the right thing to do.
1922 building is basically sound From: Jill Bishop, Annandale
I learned a lot at a Wednesday, March 26, meeting of people interested in the future of the 1922 school building. Most significantly I learned that inspections by a fire marshal and a building inspector have determined that the building is basically sound – all of it – so the myth of the condemned third floor can finally be put to rest! And although it needs improvements, the cost of fixing up the 1922 building is not prohibitive. Yet the recommendation of the Facilities Task Force to the school board will include demolition of the 1922 building, then adding on to Bendix. Does that make sense?
At the meeting I was reminded of numerous virtues of the building, particularly the spacious rooms and large windows providing natural light considered so valuable in educational settings, unlike any of the other school district’s buildings. Surely we don’t have to lose this functional and classic school building just because it is old and has been neglected. Perhaps the best thing I learned that meeting was that many others share my feelings about the value of the building. Now if only the school board does too …
It was a good meeting. If you are interested in going to the next meeting, come to the Snooty Fox on Wednesday, April 9, at 7:30 p.m. If you cannot make the meeting but would like to be kept abreast of efforts to keep the building from being demolished, e-mail me at jwbishop@lakedalelink.net.
1922 building is worth saving Jill Bishop, Annandale
Now that the school’s Facilities Task Force has been hard at work for several months on their recommendations to the school board and administration, it seems time to share my thoughts regarding the future of the 1922 building, the current middle school building – before the wrecking ball is swinging. I can’t forget the recommendation of the 2005 Task Force that said the 1922 portion of the middle school should be demolished. Will that be the recommendation of this committee too?
I strongly believe that demolishing this architectural and historic treasure would be a terrible loss to our community. The 1922 building is a precious part of Annandale, past and present, an irreplaceable building that should be preserved for the future. I care very much about Annandale and it pains me to think of losing this significant landmark.
If you agree that the 1922 school building is worth saving, for whatever reason, the people who make the decisions need to hear it. Telling the superintendent and/or someone on the school board will encourage them not to tear down this unique and distinct icon of our community. The time to make your feelings known is now, not after it is too late.